When “remedy defects” means “pay damages”: lessons from Grech v Biltar Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 636

A recent Supreme Court decision illustrates the risks of settling a building dispute by requiring a builder to “remedy defects” rather than paying money. Even where the obligation to remedy defects is contained in a formal settlement deed, the Court will rarely compel specific performance of building works. In Grech [...]

2025-10-21T14:36:16+11:00October 17th, 2025|Categories: Property|Tags: , |

Agents: Don’t pay for the privilege of working for free

A recent County Court decision (Cellmore Real Estate Pty Ltd v Funston [2025] VCC 1205) is a sharp reminder for estate agents. If an authority is not completed properly, the agency cannot recover marketing fees. In Cellmore, the Exclusive Sale Authority listed advertising costs as “TBA.” The Court found this [...]

2025-09-03T22:10:47+10:00September 3rd, 2025|Categories: Property|Tags: , |

When executors should stand firm: Court rejects “extravagant” TFM claim with heavy costs consequences

Executors are often placed under pressure to settle Testator’s Family Maintenance (TFM) claims to avoid the cost and uncertainty of litigation. A recent Victorian Supreme Court decision shows that not all claims warrant compromise and that courts are willing to protect estates against opportunistic litigation. In Lennan v Chao (No [...]

2025-09-04T10:14:05+10:00September 3rd, 2025|Categories: Litigation, Personal|Tags: , |

Challenging market rent determinations under the Retail Leases Act: key lessons for landlords and tenants

Retail leases commonly include provisions for the rent to be reset to market value at the commencement of a further term, usually following the exercise of an option by the tenant.  In these cases, an independent specialist retail valuer is appointed to determine the current market rent – a process [...]

2025-08-12T10:03:35+10:00August 11th, 2025|Categories: Property|Tags: , |

Retaining a tenant’s goods after lease termination? Think twice

Pointon Partners’ regularly advises commercial landlords and property managers on their rights and obligations when a lease is terminated. A recent decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), Cristiano v Prime Kwality Foods Pty Ltd [2025] VCAT 580, is a timely reminder of the legal and financial risks associated [...]

2025-07-28T16:02:24+10:00July 28th, 2025|Categories: Property|Tags: |

The Often Overlooked Equity of Exoneration: How It Could Save Your Family Home

With insolvencies surging by 43% in the quarter ending 29 September 2024, many small and medium businesses — and their owners — are feeling the financial strain. For directors and their families, the impact can be especially severe if personal guarantees are enforced and the family home is used as [...]

2024-12-11T11:37:17+11:00December 11th, 2024|Categories: Insolvency, Litigation, Property|Tags: |

Repainting and Recarpeting Clauses in Retail Leases: What Every Landlord and Tenant Needs to Know

Disputes commonly arise between landlords and tenants in relation to obligations imposed on the tenant to repaint and recarpet the premises. A recent decision from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) sheds light on this issue, clarifying the relationship between lease obligations and the landlord's duty to maintain [...]

2024-12-11T13:27:22+11:00December 11th, 2024|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: |

Tenant entitled to terminate commercial lease after landlord fails to investigate potential structural defects: Brotherhood of St Laurence v Sarina Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 46

Who should read this article?   Commercial landlords and tenants. The article will also be relevant to commercial property managers who are often the first port-of-call when these issues arise. In a nutshell: what do you need to know? Victoria’s highest Court has found that a landlord’s failure to investigate [...]

2024-04-16T12:20:09+10:00April 15th, 2024|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: |
Go to Top