When executors should stand firm: Court rejects “extravagant” TFM claim with heavy costs consequences

Executors are often placed under pressure to settle Testator’s Family Maintenance (TFM) claims to avoid the cost and uncertainty of litigation. A recent Victorian Supreme Court decision shows that not all claims warrant compromise and that courts are willing to protect estates against opportunistic litigation. In Lennan v Chao (No [...]

2025-09-04T10:14:05+10:00September 3rd, 2025|Categories: Litigation, Personal|Tags: , |

The Often Overlooked Equity of Exoneration: How It Could Save Your Family Home

With insolvencies surging by 43% in the quarter ending 29 September 2024, many small and medium businesses — and their owners — are feeling the financial strain. For directors and their families, the impact can be especially severe if personal guarantees are enforced and the family home is used as [...]

2024-12-11T11:37:17+11:00December 11th, 2024|Categories: Insolvency, Litigation, Property|Tags: |

Repainting and Recarpeting Clauses in Retail Leases: What Every Landlord and Tenant Needs to Know

Disputes commonly arise between landlords and tenants in relation to obligations imposed on the tenant to repaint and recarpet the premises. A recent decision from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) sheds light on this issue, clarifying the relationship between lease obligations and the landlord's duty to maintain [...]

2024-12-11T13:27:22+11:00December 11th, 2024|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: |

Tenant entitled to terminate commercial lease after landlord fails to investigate potential structural defects: Brotherhood of St Laurence v Sarina Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 46

Who should read this article?   Commercial landlords and tenants. The article will also be relevant to commercial property managers who are often the first port-of-call when these issues arise. In a nutshell: what do you need to know? Victoria’s highest Court has found that a landlord’s failure to investigate [...]

2024-04-16T12:20:09+10:00April 15th, 2024|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: |

VCAT decision provides clarity for retail landlords and tenants: Beware of mixed rent review clauses

VCAT’s recent decision in Q St Kilda Tenancy Pty Ltd v Kane (Building and Property) [2023] 75 provides helpful guidance for retail landlords and tenants concerning rent reviews and the operation of section 35(2) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (RLA). This case concerned the lease of a serviced [...]

2023-04-20T11:07:24+10:00April 20th, 2023|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: , |

A DISCLAIMER SAVES THE DAY

A recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision shows the continuing utility of disclaimers on products despite legislative reforms narrowing the scope of their effectiveness. In Mallonland Pty Ltd & Anor v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd[1]  a class action was brought on behalf of commercial farmers against the manufacturer of sorghum seed. [...]

2023-03-14T10:39:11+11:00March 14th, 2023|Categories: Commercial, Litigation|Tags: , , |

Hands off my deposit… at least for now: creative special condition modifying the operation of statutory deposit release rules deemed void

Vendors in real estate transactions are motivated to have their deposits released as early as possible. This motivation is particularly strong in relation to sales of high-value development sites, which are often sold on terms where settlement may be scheduled many years into the future. A recent decision of the [...]

2023-01-19T11:45:33+11:00January 19th, 2023|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: , , |

An expensive lesson: prospective purchasers lose $168,000 deposit after failing to comply with subject to finance clause

Buying a property can be one of the biggest and most important transactions you make during your lifetime and it is important you seek professional advice to protect your interests.     A decision of the Victorian Supreme Court[1] handed down on 5 August 2021 demonstrates the potentially disastrous consequences when a subject [...]

2021-08-12T16:55:03+10:00August 12th, 2021|Categories: Litigation, Property|Tags: |
Go to Top