Madeleine Lord2018-06-19T01:50:11+10:00

A spread stoush in Kraft v Bega: Lessons on the assignment of unregistered trade marks and underlying goodwill

In Australian law, unregistered trade marks and their associated goodwill are treated as one in the same. Goodwill can have many shapes and sources, but it is understood generally to refer to the commercial aspects of a business other than tangible assets that have attracted [...]

March 23rd, 2026|Categories: Intellectual Property|Tags: , , |

Fashion designer wins: What the Katy Perry v Katie Perry decision means for Australian trade mark owners

The long-running dispute between Australian fashion designer Katie Perry and international pop star Katy Perry has now been resolved with the High Court of Australia handing down a landmark trademark decision. The case concerned whether the Australian designer’s registered trade mark “Katie Perry” for clothing [...]

March 17th, 2026|Categories: Intellectual Property|Tags: , , |

To Scan or Not to Scan – Administrative Review Tribunal decision on Bunnings’ use of facial recognition tech

The Administrative Review Tribunal (Tribunal) recently set aside the Privacy Commissioner’s (Commissioner) 2024 determination[1] that Bunnings Group Limited’s (Bunnings) had acted unlawfully in its use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in stores, finding that Bunnings conduct in scanning customer faces fell within a statutory exception of [...]

March 4th, 2026|Categories: Commercial|Tags: , , |

No financial need, no provision: carer wife’s claim for share of husband’s estate thrown out

The Supreme Court has recently dismissed a claim brought by a surviving wife seeking provision from her deceased husband’s estate, on the basis that the wife could not demonstrate financial need. The Court found that her claim for a share of her husband’s estate had [...]

February 17th, 2026|Categories: Personal, Wills & Estates|Tags: , |

Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd v Jackson’s Art Supplies Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 1127

The Federal Court recently considered a passing-off dispute involving two competing art supplies businesses operating under the name “Jackson”. The Australian retailer and applicant, Jacksons Drawing Supplies (JDS), whom did not register the trade mark “Jackson”, brought proceedings against Jackson’s Art Supplies (JAS) the UK competitor and [...]

January 28th, 2026|Categories: Intellectual Property|Tags: , |
Go to Top